Liwaiwai Liwaiwai
  • /
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Robotics
  • Engineering
    • Architecture
    • Design
    • Software
    • Hybrid Cloud
    • Data
  • About
Liwaiwai Liwaiwai
  • /
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Robotics
  • Engineering
    • Architecture
    • Design
    • Software
    • Hybrid Cloud
    • Data
  • About
  • Data
  • Technology

MIT Experts: No, Don’t Use Blockchain To Vote

  • November 17, 2020
  • relay
Four types of voting

In the middle of a pandemic, it’s not surprising that there have been increasing calls to explore the possibility of conducting elections online. A growing number of tech start-ups have even advocated for using blockchain technology, which they say would boost voter turn-out and improve public trust.

But in a new paper looking at a range of examples, a team of MIT cybersecurity experts have come out strongly against using any form of blockchain-based voting, and said that online voting in general is much more vulnerable to being hacked than in-person or mail-in voting. They say that the physical nature of mail-in ballots make them much less susceptible to large-scale attacks compared to online voting, where exploiting a single vulnerability could impact every ballot at once.

The team says that blockchain-based approaches are ripe for what they call “serious failures” – situations where election results have been changed in ways that are undetectable, or, even if detected, would be irreparable without running a whole new election.

“While current election systems are far from perfect, blockchain would greatly increase the risk of undetectable, nation-scale election failures,” says MIT professor Ron Rivest, co-creator of RSA public-key encryption and senior author of the new paper. “Any turnout increase would come at the cost of losing meaningful assurance that votes have been counted as they were cast.”

Though blockchain-based apps like Voatz have been deployed in state and county elections, researchers like paper co-author Mike Specter have previously shown that such systems suffer from serious security vulnerabilities enabling attackers to monitor votes being cast and even change or block ballots.

Read More  A Tool To Speed Development Of New Solar Cells

Lead author Sunoo Park says that an essential quality lacking in blockchain systems is “software independence” – that is, the assurance that an undetected change or error in a system’s software cannot cause an undetectable change in the election outcome. Blockchain-based approaches require voters to use software for which a single bug could undetectably change what they see (e.g., showing them that their vote was cast for a certain candidate when it actually wasn’t).

The researchers argue that, at this point in time, only paper ballots allow voters to directly verify that their ballot accurately represents their intended vote.

“If vote-casting is entirely software-based, a malicious system could fool the voter about how the vote was actually recorded,” says Rivest, whose team’s paper was published online this week. “Democracy — and the consent of the governed — cannot be made contingent on whether some software correctly recorded voters’ choices.”

Many proponents of online voting cite the fact that industries like retail and banking have had relative success with online security for decades. But the team expresses two major objections to those parallels.

For one, they say that those systems have higher tolerances for failure that can be more readily accommodated in the case of scenarios like credit card fraud.

“For elections there is no insurance or recourse against a failure of democracy,” Rivest says. “There is no means to ‘make voters whole again’ after a compromised election.”

Secondly, with voting there are important differences in anonymity. With banking you can look at receipts to detect and fix fraudulent purchases. With voting, it’s vital that we *not* be able to prove the way we voted, so that votes cannot be sold or coerced in any way.

Read More  Living With Artificial Intelligence: How Do We Get It Right?

Park, Rivest and Specter co-wrote the paper with Neha Narula, director of MIT’s Digital Currency Initiative (DCI). This project was supported in part by the DCI, the National Science Foundation, the MIT Internet Policy Research Initiative and a Google fellowship.

 

This article is republished from MIT SCAIL by Adam Conner-Simons, MIT CSAIL

relay

Related Topics
  • Blockchain
  • CSAIL
  • Election
  • MIT
  • Voting
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Data
  • Platforms
  • Technology

How Osmo Is Digitizing Smell With Google Cloud AI Technology

  • March 20, 2023
View Post
  • Data
  • Engineering
  • Tools

Built With BigQuery: How Sift Delivers Fraud Detection Workflow Backtesting At Scale

  • March 20, 2023
View Post
  • Platforms
  • Technology

Building The Most Open And Innovative AI Ecosystem

  • March 20, 2023
View Post
  • Data

Understand And Trust Data With Dataplex Data Lineage

  • March 17, 2023
View Post
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Technology

Limits To Computing: A Computer Scientist Explains Why Even In The Age Of AI, Some Problems Are Just Too Difficult

  • March 17, 2023
View Post
  • Big Data
  • Data

The Benefits And Core Processes Of Data Wrangling

  • March 17, 2023
View Post
  • Technology

We Cannot Even Agree On Dates…

  • March 17, 2023
View Post
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Platforms
  • Technology

Using ML To Predict The Weather And Climate Risk

  • March 16, 2023

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected!
LATEST
  • 1
    How Osmo Is Digitizing Smell With Google Cloud AI Technology
    • March 20, 2023
  • 2
    Built With BigQuery: How Sift Delivers Fraud Detection Workflow Backtesting At Scale
    • March 20, 2023
  • 3
    Building The Most Open And Innovative AI Ecosystem
    • March 20, 2023
  • 4
    Understand And Trust Data With Dataplex Data Lineage
    • March 17, 2023
  • 5
    Limits To Computing: A Computer Scientist Explains Why Even In The Age Of AI, Some Problems Are Just Too Difficult
    • March 17, 2023
  • 6
    The Benefits And Core Processes Of Data Wrangling
    • March 17, 2023
  • 7
    We Cannot Even Agree On Dates…
    • March 17, 2023
  • 8
    Financial Crisis: It’s A Game & We’re All Being Played
    • March 17, 2023
  • 9
    Using ML To Predict The Weather And Climate Risk
    • March 16, 2023
  • 10
    Google Is A Leader In The 2023 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ For Enterprise Conversational AI Platforms
    • March 16, 2023

about
About
Hello World!

We are liwaiwai.com. Created by programmers for programmers.

Our site aims to provide materials, guides, programming how-tos, and resources relating to artificial intelligence, machine learning and the likes.

We would like to hear from you.

If you have any questions, enquiries or would like to sponsor content, kindly reach out to us at:

[email protected]

Live long & prosper!
Most Popular
  • 1
    The Future Of AI Is Promising Yet Turbulent
    • March 16, 2023
  • 2
    ChatGPT: How To Prevent It Becoming A Nightmare For Professional Writers
    • March 16, 2023
  • 3
    Midjourney Selects Google Cloud To Power AI-Generated Creative Platform
    • March 8, 2023
  • 4
    A Guide To Managing Your Agile Engineering Team
    • March 15, 2023
  • 5
    10 Ways Wikimedia Does Developer Advocacy
    • March 15, 2023
  • /
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Robotics
  • Engineering
  • About

Input your search keywords and press Enter.